ABSTRACT
Background: Vaccination during immunosuppression can result in impaired vaccine responses. In highly active patients requiring a rapid treatment initiation, vaccination can delay treatment onset. Natalizumab (NTZ) is a high-efficacy agent with potential low interference in vaccination responses, and could be a bridge therapy to achieve an adequate immunisation before starting another treatment. Objective(s): To assess the safety and immunogenicity of inactivated vaccines administered during NTZ treatment. Method(s): Self-controlled study based on an ongoing prospective cohort that included adult MS patients with complete immunisation schedules for hepatitis B vaccine (HBV), hepatitis A vaccine (HAV) and/or COVID-19 vaccine during NTZ treatment, between September 2016 and February 2022. Seroprotection rates were calculated for each vaccine. Demographic, clinical and radiological characteristics were collected the year before (pre-exposure period) and after vaccination (post-exposure period). Differences in annual relapse rate (ARR), contrast-enhancing lesions (CELs), new T2 lesions (NewT2) and changes in Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) during pre and post exposure period were evaluated. Patients were also categorised according to time on NTZ exposure before vaccination (long-term exposure >1 year and short-exposure <=1 year) and according to JCV status. Result(s): From 248 patients treated with NTZ, 60 were vaccinated during NTZ exposure: 44 (73%) women, mean age 45 years, mean disease duration 17 (SD 8.7) years. Thirty (50%) patients bridged to anti-CD20 after immunisation, because of high titers of JC virus. Between the pre and post-exposure period, we observed a decrease in both the AAR (0.28 vs 0.01;p=0.004) and newT2 (0.8 vs 0.02;p=0.1) and no changes in disability accumulation (EDSS 3.5 vs 3.5 p=0.6). The global seroprotection rate was 93% (91.6% (IC95% 73-99) for HAV (n=24), 92.6% (IC95% 76- 99) for HBV (n=27), 100% (IC95% 84-100) for Covid-19 (n=23)). No differences were seen between short and long term NTZ exposure or between JCV positive or negative patients, in terms of safety and immunogenicity. Conclusion(s): Immunisation with inactivated vaccines during NTZ treatment is safe and effective, both for short and long term NTZ exposure. In highly active PwMS who need immunisation, NTZ could be a valuable strategy to avoid delays in the onset of high-efficacy DMD, even in JC virus positive in which it could be used as a bridge therapy strategy.
ABSTRACT
Background: As the COVID-19 pandemic continues, evidencebased clinical guidance for managing the care of people with multiple sclerosis (MS) is an ongoing concern. In recent months, data from cohorts of people with MS has indicated that certain demographic and clinical characteristics, including use of some disease- modifying therapies (DMTs), leads to worse outcomes from SARS-CoV-2 infection. The COVID-19 in MS global data sharing initiative, which now includes over 4,500 confirmed COVID- 19 cases in people with MS, gives the opportunity to corroborate previous findings with greater certainty. Methods: Clinician-reported data from 32 countries were aggregated into a dataset of 5,543 patients who had suspected or confirmed COVID-19. Demographic and clinical covariates were queried, alongside COVID-19 clinical severity outcomes. These outcomes (hospitalisation, admission to ICU, requiring artificial ventilation, and death) were assessed in patients with suspected/ confirmed COVID-19 using multilevel mixed-effects logistic regression. All models were corrected for age, sex, EDSS, and MS type. DMTs were individually compared to glatiramer acetate (GA), as well as to pooled other DMTs and natalizumab. Results: Of 5,543 patients in the clinician-reported dataset, 909 with suspected and 4,634 with confirmed COVID-19 were included in the analysis. Previous demographic findings were confirmed: male sex, older age, progressive MS, and higher disability were associated with worse outcomes from SARS-CoV-2 infection. Use of anti-CD20 DMTs (ocrelizumab and rituximab) was associated with worse COVID-19 outcomes. Compared to GA, ocrelizumab and rituximab were associated with increased risk of hospitalisation (aOR=1.61(95%CI=1.06-2.43);aOR=2.42(95%CI=1.54-3.81) and ICU admission (aOR=3.13(95%CI=1.22-8.00);aOR=4.46 (95%CI=1.64-12.09)). Rituximab was associated with increased risk of artificial ventilation (aOR=3.57(95%CI=1.38-9.20));ocrelizumab showed a positive trend (aOR=1.86(95%CI=0.76-4.55). Rituximab showed a positive trend with increased risk of death (aOR=2.74(95%CI=0.68-11.09). Associations persisted on restriction to confirmed COVID-19 cases. Conclusions: Analysing the largest international real world dataset of people with MS who have suspected or confirmed COVID- 19 confirms previous findings that male sex, older age, progressive MS, higher disability, the use of anti-CD20 medication (ocrelizumab and rituximab) are associated with worse COVID-19 outcomes.
ABSTRACT
Introduction: Information about how SARS-CoV-2 specific humoral and cellular response is modified by disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) is scarce. Objective: To investigate humoral and cellular responses to SARS-CoV-2 and factors for presenting them in a Barcelona cohort of pwMS. Methods: Retrospective cohort study of adult unvaccinated PwMS with confirmed COVID-19 with at least one SARS-CoV-2 antibody (Ab) determination included from February 2020 to May 2021 and followed until May 2021. Demographic, clinical and laboratory data were obtained. Humoral SARS-CoV-2 response was measured with commercial chemiluminescence immunoassays targeting specific Ab against spike (IgG-S) and nucleocapsid proteins (Ig-N), as per clinical practice. SARS-CoV-2 specific T-cell response was studied in 42 selected pwMS according to DMT by a whole blood Interferon-Gamma (IFN-y) Release Immunoassay. Humoral and cellular response was assesed using a logistic regression model corrected for age, sex, comorbidities, MS form, expanded disability status scale, DMT, COVID-19 severity and PCR result. Results: 145 pwMS were enrolled (mean age 46.8 years;64.1% female;18.6% progressive forms, 20.7% untreated, 22.8% on anti-CD20s therapies and 56.6% on other DMTs). Humoral and cellular tests were performed from 0.3 to 13.1 months after COVID-19. 121(83.5%) presented positive Ab (57.6% anti-CD20 therapy, 90.2% other DMTs, 93.3% untreated). Untreated patients presented higher Ig-N titres (34.3[128.8]) compared to those with anti-CD20s (0.08[0.13], p<0.01), and other DMTs (19.55[42.92], p<0.01). Humoral response persisted over 6 months in 12/12 untreated, 9/22 with anti-CD20s and 22/28 with other DMTs (p=0.068). 31/42(73.8%) presented cellular response (81.0% anti- CD20, 62.5% other DMTs, 80.0% untreated), with similar levels of IFN-y levels among DMTs. 5/12(41.7%) anti-CD20-treated PwMS with negative Ab presented cellular response. In the multivariate analysis, humoral response decreased in anti-CD20 therapy (OR 0.08[95% CI,0.01-0.55]) and was associated with male sex (OR 3.59[1.02-12.68]). Cellular response was associated with seropositivity (OR13.0[1.29-130.4]), but can be present even in the absence of Ab. Conclusions: Humoral response is altered by DMTs, specially in anti-CD20-treated PwMS. Cellular response is associated with seropositivity but can be present in anti-CD20-treated PwMS even in the absence of Ab. Both can be detected up to 13.1 months after COVID-19.
ABSTRACT
Background: Information about humoral and cellular responses to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in patients with Multiple Sclerosis (PwMS) and other autoimmune diseases (AID) is scarce. Objective: To determine humoral and cellular responses after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in PwMS and anti-CD20-treated patients with other AID. Methods: Ongoing prospective study performed in two Catalan MS centres from February 2021. Unvaccinated adult pwMS and other anti-CD20-treated AID were recruited. Demographic, clinical and laboratory data were obtained. Whole blood samples were obtained before and 30-90 days after vaccination. The humoral response to SARS-CoV-2 was qualitatively and quantitatively measured before and after vaccination with commercial chemiluminescence immunoassays targeting SARS-CoV-2 antibodies against spike (TrimericS, IgG anti-S) and nucleocasid proteins (Elecsys, Ig anti-N). In 150 selected patients according to diseasemodifying therapy (DMT), the SARS-CoV-2 specific T-cell response was assessed after vaccination by a whole blood Interferon-Gamma Release immuno Assay (IGRA) that uses two Qiagen proprietary mixes of SARS-CoV-2 S protein (Ag.1 and Ag.2) selected to activate both CD4 and CD8 T cells. Results: 457 patients have been enrolled in the study (anti-CD20 therapy n=164, S1P DMTs n=37, natalizumab n=32, cladribine n=29, alemtuzumab n=31, other DMTs n=129, no DMT n=35). Participants characteristics are: mean age 48.1 years (SD 12.0), 69% female, 422 pwMS (29.4% progressive forms) and 35 with other AID, disease duration 13.9 years (IQR 14.1), median EDSS 3.0 (IQR 3.0). 450 have been fully vaccinated (94.2% mRNA vaccine). Pre-vaccination samples were collected 0.33 days (SD 0.5) before the first vaccine dose of which 12 (3.35%) had positive anti S/N immunoglobulin (Ig). As of June 30th, 42 post-vaccination samples have been obtained (1.3 months [SD 0.42] after the 2nd vaccination dose). Positive IgG rates were 44.8% (n=13/29) for CD20s, 100% (8/8) for other DMTs and 100% (4/4) for no DMT. No anti-N Ig were detected. Media titres of anti-S IgG were lower in anti-CD20-treated patients (7.8 [IQR 50.1]) compared to untreated patients (800 [0], p<0.01) or other DMTs (755 [228], p<0.01). Conclusions: Initial results of the study suggest blunted anti-S/N Ig response under anti-CD20 therapy. Knowledge of the cellular response in these patients will be crucial. Data from the cellular study and the completed humoral study will be presented at the meeting.